ZX-HD case and pcb development ready!

Here’s some news a lot of people are waiting for – about the development of the ZX-HD:

The case has been designed and prototypes are on the way.
And the board design has been finished as well.

If the two match as designed, production will start!
I may have them available before the end of this year.

zx-hd-post-1-jpgzx-hd-pcb-back zx-hd-pcb


DivMMC EnJOY! with 2 SD card slots

A new revision of the DivMMC EnJOY! is coming up!
This new version has two SD card slots (second is just below the primary one).

The new DivMMC EnJOY! will also have the newly developed dual-standard joystick interface, which will support both Kempston Joystick and Sinclair Joystick (selectable with a DIP switch).
When you add an extra separate joystick interface (also available from ByteDelight), you can now play multiplayer games with two joysticks!

The new revision of the DivMMC EnJOY! has mainly SMD parts, so I will soon outsource production to keep up with the demand!


New dual-standard joystick interface

I have been developing a new joystick interface, using a modern Xilinx CPLD.
This joystick interface supports Kempston joystick and Sinclair joystick (‘Sinclair 1’), selectable by a DIP switch or jumper.

It will be integrated in the new revision of the DivMMC EnJOY! interface, coming in january.

img_20161118_194028 img_20161118_194043

XC6206P33 maximum input voltage test

Recently some users of the of DivMMC EnJOY! SD card interface had to return their interface because it got defective.
All of them used the Amstrad versions of the ZX Spectrum: the +2A / +2B or +3 model.

The specific thing about these models is that they use an external power supply with +5V, +12V and -12V.
As the ZX Spectrum was first produced in 1982, these machines are about 30 years old – the Amstrad versions are from 1986/1987, so about the same age.
By the way: the older ZX Spectrum models (made by Sinclair itself) had an internal voltage circuit which was fed by a 9V external transformer. These never gave any problem to a DivMMC EnJOY! interface.

It’s not that weird that power the corresponding power supplies (PSUs) will develop problems due to that age.
As I had 4 defective DivMMC EnJOY! interfaces within two months, all connected to a ZX Spectrum +2A/+2B/+3, my early conclusion was that these PSUs are now failing more and more.
But what is odd is that the machines themselves kept working, even after the DivMMC EnJOY! developed a defect.

So I had to prove that it is indeed the PSU is the troublemaker.
The first thing I did was develop a small PSU replacement using a modern switching 12V power supply, and a 12 to 5V DC-DC converter:

The -12V isn’t needed for normal operation of those machines, only when using the RS232 or MIDI output or the external ZX Keypad.
Almost noone use that (except for myself: I built a ZX Spectrum laserharp using the MIDI output of a ZX Spectrum +2B), so I left it out.

This power supply worked like a charm!
Some test users (both had a defective DivMMC EnJOY! twice, caused by the same machine) who I sent this replacement PSU for free didn’t have any problem anymore after using only that one.


But the question remained of how to prevent this problem with other ZX Spectrum +2A/+2B/+3 users.
The defect caused on the DivMMC EnJOY! was the voltage regulator and the CPLD chip.
This Xilinx CPLD is known to be very stable, so something like a voltage spike must have destroyed it.
My best guess was the voltage regulator (an XC6206P33) which had troubles with the old PSUs.

So a week ago I was looking for an alternative.
My first thought was to google for “XC6206P33 problems”, and indeed I found a German forum which described that this vreg is very sensitive to any voltage above 6V.
I had read that the maximum input voltage of this regulator is 6V, but I assumed that was the maximum continuous input voltage

I needed to know it for myself, so I created a test setup:


I wanted to know the output voltage with some load that represents the CPLD of the DivMMC EnJOY!, and with several input voltages above 5V.

Here’s the test setup without load and 5V input.
I mostly show the input voltages on the photos so you know what I was using when taking them. but there are two leds on the board showing if input and output voltage are present.
I thought that once the XC6206P33 is destroyed, the output voltage will dissapear and the right of the two leds will go off.


No load was attached when taking this picture.
Next I attached a 6V power supply (I have them for old retrocomputer tape players):


Then I added a load, which results in a current of about 50mA:


It still runs fine at about 50mA @6V (I measured the 3.3V output too, which was ok):


After that I got a 7V supply (using the difference between the 5V and 12V outputs of this switching PSU):


As these 5V  +12V PSU outputs are not filtered much, I added a simple capacitor:


With the load the input (!) voltage of the XC6202P33 dropped to 2.16V!
I didn’t check the output this time (sorry!).


Strange thing was that without load, the XC6206P33 gave a neat 3.3V output (photo shows input voltage only, a little lower than 7V).


I got back to 5V to check if the XC6206P33 was still working ok, and it was.


Next was 9V.
Without load on the XC6206P33, it ran fine with an output still at 3.3V.


But putting back the resistor (50mA), and the input voltage dropped again, just as with the 7V PSU:


With some more load (100mA), the input voltage was 0.3V (!), so the input almost got short circuited!


I was curious about the output.
It was way over 3.3V!


After a minute it dropped to less than 3.3V:


But the XC6206P33 still was working, although I expected it to collapse.

I thought I’d test one higher input voltage, 12V this time.
Here’s the output voltage:


4.77V! This will definately destroy the CPLD.

Now think of what happens in a situation with a voltage spike over 7V (on the 5V line of the ZX Spectrum +2A / +2B / +3 PSU):
1. The vreg will output a higher voltage than the nominal 3.3V for a short time.
2. The CPLD will break
3. The defective CPLD pulls the vreg with it at the same time, causing both to be destroyed

So IMHO this proves that the old Amstrad PSUs that came with the ZX Spectrum +2A/+2B / +3 are causing these problems.
It’s only a matter of time before the ZX Spectrums themselves will get in trouble.
There is a real need to replace these old PSUs.


After studying the XC6206P33 I selected this drop in replacement part (SOT-23-3 case) for the DivMMC EnJOY!: the MCP1702T-3302.
This voltage regulator has exactly the same environmental specs (same external capacitors, same footprint, etc), but can take up to 14.5V input voltage.

So I ordered some and put the MCP1702T-3302 to the test, with 12V input.
Here’s the output with 50mA load:


So from now I will use this MCP1702T-3302 voltage regulator on the DivMMC EnJOY!.
Of course I will repair defective ones that may occur in the future, but I will also motivate people to replace their PSU on the ZX Spectrum +2A / +2B / +3.


website rainbow logo background

The history of ESXDOS and the DivMMC

Two years ago I wrote an article about the complete history of ESXDOS and the DivMMC.
It was meant to be published in Suc-Session or SPC  newsletter.
As it got being delayed, I posted the article at World of Spectrum, but simply never thought to post it here on ByteDelight.com.
So it’s about time 😉

A must read for all ZX Spectrum enthusiasts!

The history of ESXDOS and the DivMMC (click)


Connecting PC floppydrives to a Shugart (retrocomputer) disk interface

I often get questions about wiring PC floppydrives to a Shugart compatible floppy disk interface, which was the most used standard in the 80s.
So I decided to post the solution for this.

Underneath you will see two wiring diagrams:
1. Wiring PC floppydrives to a PC with a standard PC floppy cable: wires 10-16 are twisted before Drive A
2. Wiring  PC floppydrives to a retro computer with Shugart disk interface: wires 10-12 need to be twisted before Drive 0

So for using a PC floppydrive on a Shugart interface, the easiest solution (without having to solder on a PC drive) is to twist wires 10-12.

If like me you have a bunch of PC floppydrive cables you want to use for wiring PC floppydrives to a Shugart interface, it indeed implies that the twist on wires 10-16 must be removed and only wires 10-12 need to be twisted.
I have a stock of new 34 pin IDC floppy connectors for that, and use a vise to apply them to the cable.

Shugart vs IBM floppy